Messageboard

About Edward from USA:

2026 Plans for Here For It All? (112,612) by Edward from USA Bobby A, sadly there's probably not going to be an "HFIA" Deluxe Edition. Outside of her hardcore fans, nobody seem to care about the album. Mariah and Gamma aren't about to keep throwing money at something that isn't giving anything back. At the end of the day, Gamma is a business. It was a joint version, and both parties did what they could. You wouldn't keep pouring water into a bottomless barrel expecting it to get full, would you? And the whole "Mariah's Christmas popularity is fading" thing? Not really. The economy is just trash right now. Everything is expensive, people are losing jobs, and most folks are just trying to survive the holidays, not spend on unnecessary things like flights and concert tickets. Competition is tough in Vegas when Mariah doesn't bring anything new to her shows. Even with all that, Mariah's still doing her thing. Bublé's Christmas is 14 years old, Merry Christmas is 31 years old, and the fact that her album is back up at #14 (and looking to jump into the top 10 next week) is wild. That's not someone "declining", that's someone with ridiculous staying power. I don't think she should've moved her Christmas show to Vegas. It kinda took away that warm, cozy, classic Mariah holiday vibe. It worked better when it was more intimate and easier for fans to get to. She reigned supreme at Beacon Theater for a decade and she also did great at MSG. Both venues were a train away for most people. (Saturday 6 December 2025; 14:59) this is a reply to message 112,600

2026 Plans for Here For It All? (112,600) by Bobby A from United States I don't think there will a deluxe version now for several reasons. HFIA faded quicker than Caution. The support from Gamma was not there two weeks after the album dropped. September 26th was just the wrong release date for HFIA. Type Dangerous was released June. Sugar Sweet was not promoted for success on the charts. Do you see what I am saying? Also, it seems like we are seeing a decline in MC's Christmas holiday popularity. Her Christmastime shows are not selling out. Sony didn't do anything special for Merry Christmas or AIWFCIY this holiday season. Even radio airplay for AIWFCiY this year is down compared to last year. Michael Buble's Christmas is #1 on iTunes while MC's Merry Christmas is #14. Is MC's popularity during the Christmas holiday season waning? (Friday 5 December 2025; 07:06)

Would you rather? (112,609) by Edward from USA Does she do that? I thought she was Mary Poppins reincarnated. (Saturday 6 December 2025; 12:48) this is a reply to message 112,607

Would you rather? (112,607) by Bill from the UK What I don't understand is how parents are fine to let their young daughters listen to her swear and speak in an especially vulgar way in so many of her songs. With the internet there's no escaping it, but children should not be desensitised to language that foul. (Saturday 6 December 2025; 11:37)

Would you rather? (112,608) by Edward from USA I agree. At least Rihanna released catchy songs I could blast while working now. (Saturday 6 December 2025; 12:45) this is a reply to message 112,606

Would you rather? (112,606) by TJ from Norway I really don't understand why TS is so popular. It's like people are under a spell. (Saturday 6 December 2025; 09:45)

Would you rather? (112,604) by Edward from USA I would go with scenario #1. Taylor is still young and massively popular, she's only seven songs away from catching Mariah's 19 #1s, and with the way she releases albums, she'll hit that sooner rather than later. She doesn't even need a traditional single; she can take over the top 12 positions on Hot 100 on pure sales alone. I think that the "most #1s" record isn't safe long-term, but extending the run for AIWFCIY to 21 weeks or more is a record we won't see broken in our lifetime. (Saturday 6 December 2025; 01:44) this is a reply to message 112,603

Would you rather? (112,603) by T from USA If you could only chose one. Would you rather Mariah have the record for the longest running #1 hit or the most #1 hits? Scenario 1) AIWFCIY is number one for three more weeks giving it a total of twenty one weeks, and 100 weeks in total on the Hot 100. Scenario 2) AIWFCIY stalls forever at eighteen weeks, but her next two singles (featured or solo) go to #1, and so her all time Hot 100 total is 99 weeks. Pick one. (Friday 5 December 2025; 23:55)

Spotify 2025 (112,590) by Edward from USA Sorry, but I have to snitch. It was Stacey. (Thursday 4 December 2025; 02:07) this is a reply to message 112,587

Spotify 2025 (112,587) by TJ from Norway Someone must have hacked my account. Most played song: Type Dangerous. Album: number 1 Daydream, number 2 Music Box , number 3 Here for it All? This can't be correct, since I didn't listen to that album more than one day, and not even the whole album. Crazy. (Wednesday 3 December 2025; 18:18)

My Love (112,586) by Edward from USA Same sentiment. "Lead The Way" is a real power ballad, the low buttery parts are as difficult to sing as the last sustained note. "Till The End Of Time" is pure passion, it really takes its time building up till it explodes. I miss her going all out vocally on some ballads. It's been almost 12 years since she belted on an album. (Wednesday 3 December 2025; 03:45) this is a reply to message 112,583

My Love (112,583) by Stacey from USA I am so glad MC released Lead The Way. She has said that is her favorite song off Glitter. It's mine too. The song has that same emotional build up and release like Till The End of Time. I let out a big sigh of release when those songs end. (Tuesday 2 December 2025; 17:32)

Here it comes (112,584) by Edward from USA "AIWFCIY" is about to hit 100 next week, but Brenda's "RATCT" is sharpening candy canes and plotting. Fingers crossed. (Tuesday 2 December 2025; 23:30)

Michael and Justin (112,575) by Edward from USA Of course, it's different when it comes to sampling or using someone's actual vocal recording, like for a duet or remix. In those situations, you do need clearance from the copyright owner and the artist, because you're using the original recording, not just the song. (Monday 1 December 2025; 16:18) this is a reply to message 112,574

Isn't it ironic, don't you think? (112,574) by Edward from USA Mariah can't stop anyone from covering her songs. Same with Prince, he wasn't happy about "Nothing Compares 2 U" being released, but legally, there was nothing he could do. Once a song has been released to the public in the U.S., the copyright owner can't block someone else from recording a cover. This is because of what's called a compulsory mechanical license. After the original version is out, any artist can legally record and distribute their own version without asking the songwriter for permission. For example, if Kelly Clarkson wanted to cover any Mariah Carey song, she could record and release it without ever asking Mariah, she would just need to secure the mechanical license and pay the required royalties. Those royalties are handled through agencies like the Harry Fox Agency or a pro such as ASCAP or BMI, which make sure the original songwriter and publisher get paid. So even though Mariah Carey has said she doesn't really like other people doing her songs, that's just her personal preference. It doesn't give her legal power to stop a cover, as long as the proper licensing steps are followed. (Monday 1 December 2025; 15:28)

Isn't it ironic, don't you think? (112,574) by Edward from USA Mariah can't stop anyone from covering her songs. Same with Prince, he wasn't happy about "Nothing Compares 2 U" being released, but legally, there was nothing he could do. Once a song has been released to the public in the U.S., the copyright owner can't block someone else from recording a cover. This is because of what's called a compulsory mechanical license. After the original version is out, any artist can legally record and distribute their own version without asking the songwriter for permission. For example, if Kelly Clarkson wanted to cover any Mariah Carey song, she could record and release it without ever asking Mariah, she would just need to secure the mechanical license and pay the required royalties. Those royalties are handled through agencies like the Harry Fox Agency or a pro such as ASCAP or BMI, which make sure the original songwriter and publisher get paid. So even though Mariah Carey has said she doesn't really like other people doing her songs, that's just her personal preference. It doesn't give her legal power to stop a cover, as long as the proper licensing steps are followed. (Monday 1 December 2025; 15:28) this is a reply to message 112,573

Isn't it ironic, don't you think? (112,573) by Mi.I.am.A.Lamb from Poland Billy has became a friend of MC so it was very personal. For years Kelly Clarkson has been expressing her huge desire to cover Mariah's songs ("Miss you most" among others) but MC is not clearing that one. She is so protective of her catalogue although in previous years she did allow Michael Bublé and Idina Menzel to record AIWFCIY. (Monday 1 December 2025; 14:08)

Prince (112,561) by Edward from USA Prince always had this lingering disdain for Sinead O'Connor, and for a person like him with a Napoleon complex, it's hard not to see why: she took "Nothing Compares 2 U" and turned it into the cultural moment he never could. He and the giant diva swallowed held onto that resentment right up until the day he died. Sinead earned pennies from that song compared to the millions that flowed his way. Look at someone like Dolly Parton. She openly loves that Whitney turned "I Will Always Love You" into a global phenomenon, because she understood the bigger picture: a great cover only elevates the songwriter. She laughed all the way to the bank and thanked Whitney every chance she got. Prince and Mariah both getting touchy when someone else breathes new life into their songs feels... ironic. At the end of the day, it's ego. If you're going to play in the world of reinterpretation, you can't fall apart when someone does it too, sometimes even better. I don't think Mariah gives two fs about people covering her songs. She's just worried that someone could pull a "Nothing Compares 2 U" on one of her songs. It's all about ego and insecurity. (Sunday 30 November 2025; 15:20) this is a reply to message 112,552

Prince (112,552) by Lambi from USA Prince covered songs all the time though like Just My Imagination, Superstition, and Come Together, but only live and never on record. He did not like the idea of other people making money off his work, and Mariah probably feels the same way. Live performances seems to be fine but releasing them commercially is not. By that metric, she was not dissing Muni at all. I also do not think Mariah is complaining. She was even smiling here. She has always shown love to people who sampled her songs. She appreciated Like Mariah by Fifth Harmony, she approved Emotionless by Drake, she even jumped in on the Big Energy Remix and used Bryson Tillers SIO sample for a transition in concerts. She has consistently been supportive of people who sample her music tastefully. There is nothing inherently wrong with covering songs anyway. Mariah debuted with all originals, but when she was asked to do a cover for MTV Unplugged (just for TV), she then realized she could absolutely elevate a song. And had no problem doing on record: Without You, Open Arms and all that came after. But before I'll Be There, they originally wanted her to cover Aretha's Natural Woman, but out of respect for Aretha, Mariah went to Carole King and asked to write something new instead, and that is how If It's Over was born. She is at the core, a true songwriter, just like Prince, and really wanted make that a statement. And today I feel she really proved it. (Sunday 30 November 2025; 04:07)

Isn't it ironic, don't you think? (112,560) by Edward from USA I think it really comes down to taste. Aside from some of his early work, I've never been a big fan of Prince or his style of singing. I've actually played both versions of "The Beautiful Ones" for people who had never heard either version before, including people who don't even speak the language, and Mariah's version has always been the favorite. She and Sisqo did a great job with it. (Sunday 30 November 2025; 15:02) this is a reply to message 112,556

Isn't it ironic, don't you think? (112,556) by Mimi from UK I agree with you on that Mariah is being a hypocrite, but to say her cover of Beautiful Ones is better than Prince´s is crazy. Mariah did a good job on that cover, but it does not compare to the original. I'm a die hard MC fan but that's just crazy to state that, lol. (Sunday 30 November 2025; 07:09)

Muni Long (112,559) by Edward from USA You're not the only one, I didn't know who she was either. (Sunday 30 November 2025; 14:55) this is a reply to message 112,557

Muni Long (112,557) by Bill from the UK Am I the only one here who has no idea who or what Muni Long is? (Sunday 30 November 2025; 12:18)

Isn't it ironic, don't you think? (112,551) by Edward from USA Isn't it ironic that Mariah is not a fan of other artists covering her songs, considering how much of her own catalog is built on sampling, re-recording, and re-imagining other people's work. Prince genuinely hated people covering his songs, especially when those covers started becoming bigger and better known than the originals. It even got to the point where, at his own concerts, people thought he was the one covering those songs. I can definitely see why that would drive him crazy. Magically, Mariah's attitude toward other artists covering her songs shifted right around the time Prince, the ultimate diva in himself, brushed off her cover of "The Beautiful Ones". I think her take was phenomenal, and if we're honest, with all due respect to his fans, hers outshines his. From that moment on, it feels like she picked up a few pages from his diva playbook and, unoriginally, folded them into her own arsenal, even though a part of her work has always incorporated existing. I adore Mariah, but she really needs to stop with the bs. You can't complain about people covering your songs while you've been doing the same thing for 35 years now, and let's not get into all the sampling. (Sunday 30 November 2025; 02:48)

Some say that's tough (112,495) by Edward from USA Someone isolated just the background vocals, and once again you can hear how good Mariah is at building those crazy, beautifully detailed layers you barely notice in the full mix. But that weird sound in there? It adds nothing. It totally sounds like a glitch. Whatever it was supposed to be, it makes no sense. It actually reminds me of that glitch on one of the Memoirs tracks. (Monday 24 November 2025; 20:53) this is a reply to message 112,482

Some say that's tough (112,482) by Chicago Lamb from USA It's there and it's intentional. Sounds like a snicker. (Monday 24 November 2025; 13:46)

Queen of Christmas (112,492) by Edward from USA I don't think she should've tried in the first place. The backlash was immediate, and honestly, predictable. You can't trademark a general Christmas term, it just comes off as ridiculous. The moment she filed for "Queen of Christmas", I knew it was going to blow back on her ass. Mariah already owns a piece of Christmas culturally. She earned that organically through her music and impact, she didn't need a legal title to prove it. Trying to lock it down for profit only made her look unnecessarily greedy, and it distracted from what she actually excels at: being the soundtrack of the season without even trying. (Monday 24 November 2025; 17:14) this is a reply to message 112,489

Queen of Christmas (112,489) by Dove from United States I think she should try to trademark this again. Maybe she could write a Christmas song about the Virgin Mary and call the song "Queen of Christmas" so nobody gets any ideas. I don't know why other singers are against this. Mariah Carey is the queen of Christmas. Also, wishlist: Christmas duet with Kelly Clarkson Cover of Winter Wonderland Cover of Last Christmas by Wham Cover of Christmas Tree Farm by Taylor Swift Christmas duet with Doja Cat (original song with rap verses) (Monday 24 November 2025; 15:48)

Some say that's tough (112,477) by Edward from USA While listening to "Here For It All", I noticed a brief distortion that sounds like a sped-up, slightly warped male voice, almost the way a CD glitches for a split second. At first I thought it was just my copy, but I checked the YouTube lyric video and the distortion is there as well. It happens right after she finishes the line: "Some say that's tough." And for some reason, once I heard it, I can't unhear it. Every time I listen, it jumps out at me. Can any of you hear it as well? Do you think it's intentional, part of the production, or does it sound like someone saying something in the background? If you can make out what that brief sound/voice might be, I'd love to know. If you can't hear it, I think it's time for me to check my meds and get them right. (Monday 24 November 2025; 01:18)

A little life update (112,452) by Edward from USA Mimi, great news indeed. Congratulations to you and your husband. A little baby girl, how amazing. I'm really happy for you. Wishing you a smooth, healthy pregnancy and sending lots of love your way. And I already know she's going to be the cutest little lamb, raised with great taste from day one. Keep us posted when you can. (Thursday 20 November 2025; 17:29) this is a reply to message 112,447

A little life update (112,447) by Mimi L. from Empower Your Highlighter I wanted to share some good news with my little MCA family, it's also the reason I've been MIA mostly the past few months. My husband and I are expecting our first baby, a little baby girl. You best believe she will be introduced to Mariah really early on so we will have a baby lamb joining the lambily soon. Who knows down the line Eric may have a new member join this board haha. Keep us in your thoughts and prayers. Promise I won't be influenced by Nick Cannon's baby names. (Thursday 20 November 2025; 12:44)

Billboard (112,436) by Edward from USA Mariah didn't crack the top 10, but she landed at #11, which is still impressive. I think she'll hit number one in the first week of December. (Wednesday 19 November 2025; 01:21)

I won't allow it (112,435) by Edward from USA Naming a boy Legendary Love is diabolical. But instead of blaming Nick, I blame the baby mamas who let him choose those hideous names. (Wednesday 19 November 2025; 01:05) this is a reply to message 112,432

I won't allow it (112,432) by Lambi from USA I literally can't. Imagine making a child say, "Hi. I'm Beautiful/Powerful/Legendary" as an introduction. "You're what? Oh that's your name?" Why did they not think these through? Was he saying affirmations in the mirror every day so something called him to name them adjectives? Was he just so deep in his divinity study that he felt "Rise Messiah" was appropriate? I know some celebrities tend to have "the chosen" syndrome, thinking they're truly the chosen ones so they name their kids "Saint" and "Kulture" but Nick Cannon took it to another level I never thought possible. Because what do you mean, "Powerful Queen"? How do you actually expect anyone to ever take them seriously? (Tuesday 18 November 2025; 22:03)

I won't allow it (112,431) by Edward from USA Those are names only a narcissist could come up with. Sadly, the kids are the ones who'll have to deal with the consequences. Imagine introducing yourself: "Hi, my name is Legendary Love, my sister's name is Powerful Queen, and, just in case you're religious, my anointed little brother is named Rise Messiah." Lord, have mercy. I can understand these women having children with Nick for the financial security he provides, but letting him saddle their kids with such ridiculous names? That's the part I'll never understand. Before his selfish attempt at creating his own "tribe", I used to defend Nick whenever people criticized or blamed him for anything. But at this point, and given his behavior, I really don't like him anymore. It's obvious he views his kids as extensions of himself, which is another classic trait of a narcissist. (Tuesday 18 November 2025; 17:25) this is a reply to message 112,430

I won't allow it (112,430) by Dove from United States I thought it was satire when I saw those names too. (Tuesday 18 November 2025; 15:06)

Yours (112,425) by Edward from USA Exactly. I think Mariah hasn't pushed for it out of self-respect. (Tuesday 18 November 2025; 02:46) this is a reply to message 112,424

Yours (112,424) by Lambi from USA RCA might've punched the air in 2005 when they realized how much they fumbled the bag. Mariah outshined, out-prettied, out-sang everyone else in the game and definitively outdid herself. (Monday 17 November 2025; 23:32)

Yours (112,418) by Edward from USA Not really. Mariah has been far more relevant than Justin ever since the success of TEOM. If Mariah had approached RCA anytime after 2005, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have had any objections. (Monday 17 November 2025; 04:20) this is a reply to message 112,417

Yours (112,417) by Bobby A from United States We will never hear Yours until JT is no longer recording for RCA. (Sunday 16 November 2025; 20:29)

Yours (112,410) by Edward from USA Mariah wanted "Yours" with Justin Timberlake released as a single, but at the time he was at the peak of his solo career, and his label thought associating him with her could hurt his image. They still viewed the "Glitter" situation as a liability, so the collaboration never got the green light despite Mariah pushing for it. (Sunday 16 November 2025; 03:51) this is a reply to message 112,399

Damizza won't stop vomiting untruths (112,399) by BFF from United States I actually believe it in the sense that I think the idea was proposed to Mariah by Island/Def Jam but she shot it down really quickly. It sounds like the proposal came around 2002-2004 when Jennifer Lopez's career was surging and Mariah was still in the wilderness from the "Glitter" fallout. I don't think the duet was ever going to happen, but the idea being proposed to her sounds credible to me. I also remember Mariah recording a version of "Yours" with Justin Timberlake and the information that Mariah had collaborated with Daniel Bedingfield as well. It sounds like Island/Def Jam was trying to pressure Mariah into these duets to ensure a "hit" for "Charmbracelet", but it was clear that Mariah's vision for "Charmbracelet" was healing and catharsis and not commercial appeal. I think it was the right move to table all of these collaborations during that period. Otherwise, Mariah would have been accused of riding those people's coattails back to the charts. (Saturday 15 November 2025; 14:53)

Article: Mariah Carey's rare demo tape hits auction (112,409) by Edward from USA That's why I rip all my CDs in an uncompressed (lossless) format so they sound as they were intended. I carry her entire collection on my cellphone. In case there's something wrong with Internet, I can still listen to them. (Sunday 16 November 2025; 03:40) this is a reply to message 112,404

Article: Mariah Carey's rare demo tape hits auction (112,404) by TJ from Norway I was a hard core collector from 1993 to 2007, and was able to get most of the cd singles from 1990 to 1992 later on. I remember looking at cd singles in 1990, and I didn't understand why I should buy them. Stupid me. Learning by doing. Spotify is not as good as a cd when it comes to the sound. It's always a pleasure to hear a song on radio, because then you realise how bad the sound on Spotify is. (Saturday 15 November 2025; 20:18)

Top 10 (112,406) by Edward from USA Great news, you guys. "AIWFCIY" is predicted to crack the Top 10 on the Billboard Hot 100, jumping from #31 to #10. We'll know for sure once the chart updates tomorrow. If it maintains this momentum, it will hit the top spot as early as the following week, fingers crossed. (Saturday 15 November 2025; 21:46)

MORE MESSAGES